discussions of sociometry

[Ann Hale]

I gave Adam quite a slam last week, when I opened my emails after a short trip and an illness. I referred to his "musings" and asked him to move onto something else.  It was curt and hurtful for which he is owed an apology.

I warmed to Adam after the plenary session at the ASGPP San Antonio conference when he was so open to involving the attendees in "what's new" in the field.  Adam, whenever you ask questions or make statements about sociometry, a subject fond to my heart, I feel compelled to write....sometimes more fully than other times.  I do not get the sense that my replies are read by you.

What is lacking to me is much of a response.  It takes time for me to frame a reply, especially when the question is one which feels "surgical"....like if this doesn't occur, is it sociometry? If the exercises don't clearly identify tele, are they just warm-ups and not about the sociometry process?

I began to suspect that you Adam rather like these titilating sorts of questions.  The mulluing over seems more important than a reply, at least this is my experience.

I value my time, and the efforts to be clear.  I think it is best that I stop trying to make sense of these sorts of forays into a mind field not of my making.  I regret my latest annoyance spilled onto the "list".  

Ann Hale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://grouptalkweb.org/pipermail/list_grouptalkweb.org/attachments/20090731/d0140b65/attachment.html>