Transference
Jenny Wilson
jenny at blennerhassett.gen.nz
Mon Jul 13 01:50:22 CDT 2009
Hi Adam
Thanks for reminding me of this - I have found several articles that
look promising.
regards
Jenny
Adam Blatner wrote:
> Please check out www.pdbib.org Jim Sacks' psychodrama bibliography.
> Many articles on transference. Use search engine and key word. Please
> pass this message about this most valuable resource along to everyone in
> your network. Warmly, Adam
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny Wilson"
> <jenny at blennerhassett.gen.nz>
> To: "Peter Howie" <peterhowie at macquariehouse.com.au>
> Cc: "Group talk Listserv" <list at grouptalkweb.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 2:09 AM
> Subject: Transference
>
>
>> Hi Peter
>> If you or others do know of good articles on transference and
>> psychodrama can you forward me the references please. It is a really
>> interesting area and I would like to learn more.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Jenny
>>
>> Peter Howie wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am working up a short term curriculum at present and thought I would
>>> try and clarify this area of work if anyone is up for a challenge. And
>>> if it is so old hat and has been covered to death please point me in the
>>> right direction.
>>>
>>> If the social atom is indeed the smallest unit that we can work with -
>>> either from a practical or theoretical point of view, then I think it
>>> stands to reason that transference and counter transference are never
>>> entirely or even mostly arising from an individuated personality but are
>>> a product of the larger social atom.
>>>
>>> When I think like this I am greatly relieved from having to distinguish
>>> transference from simply having an idea about someone. I find that if
>>> transference is at work at all, then it seems as if it is at work at all
>>> times and it is simply a matter of degree (how much is a transference
>>> from another experience) or degree of importance (how much it interferes
>>> with current relationships) as to whether or not to work with it. One
>>> thing I find hard with the idea of transference is that it seems very
>>> like some of the early template models of the way the brain/mind work. I
>>> can't seem to separate out the transference part of a relationship from
>>> say, my memory of the last time we met, or the first time we met, or how
>>> because you are a Dr I generalise an aspect of my relating to you to all
>>> the other Drs I know.
>>>
>>> Can others help me here?
>>>
>>> Mostly I try and use role theory and the idea of the reciprocating
>>> nature of the way we are with one another.
>>>
>>> Cheers while I get back to the other task
>>>
>>> Peter in Brisbane
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/07/2009, at 5:58 AM, Edward Schreiber wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems to me that the whole is larger than its parts, although Zerka
>>>> has written that psychodrama/sociodrama fall under an umbrella of
>>>> sociometry. I think also that the whole method has to include this
>>>> thing called sociatry, the fourth element to the triadic system.
>>>> Thank you Adam and Ann.
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 10, 2009, at 10:29 PM, Ann Hale wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> *From:* Ann Hale <mailto:annehale at swva.net>
>>>>> *To:* Adam Blatner <mailto:adam at blatner.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2009 10:28 PM
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Sociometry Training
>>>>>
>>>>> Having a special award may seem like a neat thing to do, but it is
>>>>> another way to split sociometry off from the action methods, as iff
>>>>> it exists apart from the integrative whole as envisioned by Moreno.
>>>>> Of course you can separate out "techniques" for a structured learning
>>>>> situation, but it is hard to leave out the applied and action part.
>>>>>
>>>>> Every traumatic event is a sociometric one. Every warm-up is a
>>>>> sociometric one. Every psychodrama, role play, sociodrama,
>>>>> bibliodrama, soul drama, etc. has a foundation in the the nature of
>>>>> the interpersonal connections which support the risks taken, the
>>>>> willing acceptance of roles, and sharing from the heart. Psychodrama
>>>>> is full-circle sociometry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's just keep on, keeping on the soul train of the whole shebang.
>>>>> Ann Hale
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> *From:* Adam Blatner <mailto:ablatner at verizon.net>
>>>>> *To:* ABE Psychodrama <mailto:abepsychodrama at yahoo.com> ;
>>>>> GroupTalk <mailto:list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2009 5:26 PM
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Sociometry Training
>>>>>
>>>>> So what about having an ASGPP award for people who make
>>>>> substantial contributions to advancing sociometry? I have
>>>>> proposed this recently, and of course folks will need to think
>>>>> about it. But it does seem as if sociometry continues to be given
>>>>> more weight in the last twenty years. Warmly, Adam
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> *From:* ABE Psychodrama <mailto:abepsychodrama at yahoo.com>
>>>>> *To:* GroupTalk <mailto:list at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 26, 2009 3:32 PM
>>>>> *Subject:* Sociometry Training
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual Rebecca and Ann have been most articulate on the
>>>>> subject of sociometry. I would agree that sociometry is best
>>>>> taught in training groups and I weave in the Sociometric
>>>>> Healing Circle as a way to explore how sociometry impacts
>>>>> every relationship that we create. I also teach the
>>>>> unorthodox and that is intrapersonal and transpersonal
>>>>> sociometry. I believe that the same sociometric patterns
>>>>> that we create with others we also create within ourselves
>>>>> (part of our self, parts of our physical body, etc) and with
>>>>> transpersonal figures. It take a long time, maybe a few
>>>>> lifetimes, to really come to accept and be compassionate to
>>>>> all. We can reject something/someone without anger,
>>>>> resentment, hurt and judgment. At least I believe that is
>>>>> theoretically possible . I am still working on this myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dale Richard Buchanan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org <mailto:List at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.92/2203 - Release
>>>>> Date: 06/26/09 05:53:00
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org <mailto:List at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org <mailto:List at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>>
>>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>>> List at grouptalkweb.org <mailto:List at grouptalkweb.org>
>>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Grouptalk mailing list
>>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>>
>> Grouptalk mailing list
>> List at grouptalkweb.org
>> http://grouptalkweb.org/mailman/listinfo/list_grouptalkweb.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.12/2233 - Release Date:
> 07/12/09 08:20:00
>
More information about the List
mailing list